Darren Heling: take .69 minus it by .49 and theres one answertake .81 minus .69 and theres another answertake 1 and minus it by .81 and theres another answerthen you look at all three answers and you will see the pattern...Show more
Zelma Casebier: Are you sure it's not 0.49, 0.64, 0.81 and 1? The pattern for that would be:0.7(squared), 0.8(squared), 0.9(squared), 1.0(squared)
Ofelia Kieck: 0.49, 0.69, 0.89, 1, 1.49, 1.69, 1.89, 2, 2.49, etc.
Dexter Dingus: .49 - .69 is a difference of .20.69 - .81 is a difference of .12.81 - 1 is a difference of .19So if it continues to decrease in this pattern (20 12 19 11 18 10) then the next one would be 1.11...Show more
Donte Liversedge: I wish I could help you, but I have no idea.
Tommy Durrenberger: if the second one was 0.64 I could help you. Since it's not, this sequence makes no sense.
Mitchell Pickens: Those numbers represent the amount of time (in minutes) each beer will add to my love maki! ng as I get progressively drunker. The number will continue to rise at an exponential rate until I hit 18 beers, at which time the minutes go to zero.
Dana Russian: well, if it was .64 then i'd see a patternthat wouuld be.7 squared, .8, .9 1.0
No comments:
Post a Comment